Tag Archives: Communications

Anatomy of an Apology: Akio Toyoda

In an age of mistrust, even the smallest slipup can destroy a well-cultivated corporate image.  So it’s no wonder that Toyota is scrambling to control the fallout from their latest recalls.  The acceleration problems that have led to a recall of more than two million cars aren’t simply a quality-control issue – they strike at the heart of the company’s value proposition: reliable cars that keep your family safe.

Much has already been written about Toyota’s response to this corporate crisis, and especially their failure to act more quickly.  I want to focus on a specific event, Akio Toyoda’s February 9 Op-Ed in the Washington Post. The point is not to assess Toyota’s overall approach to this crisis or to predict its effectiveness. Continue reading

Is trust really back for business?

“How much do you trust business to do what is right?”

That is the question posed in the Edelman 2010 Trust Barometer. And the good news – if you can call it that – is that 54% of Americans believe that business will do the right thing, representing an 18% jump from last year.  

But business should hardly celebrate. First, there is always the risk of mistaking a majority for a mandate. This number is barely half the population at best and means that the other half don’t trust business to do what is right. And while the numbers are not broken out, my guess is that only a very small percentage of the population feels strongly about their belief in business.

More importantly, being acknowledged as a company that will “do what is right” is not really a ringing endorsement. I might believe that a company will “do what is right,” on the big things – fraud, serious product safety issues, etc. – while also doing everything that it can to put its profits and shareholders ahead of its customers. In other words, I might trust the company’s big actions but remain skeptical of its everyday interactions with me as a customer.

In fact, that is what I see everyday. Even where companies are not perceived as inherently evil, the overwhelming majority of Americans view them with a skeptical eye. This trust, even if it is increasing, is incredibly fragile.

Bulldog Reporter Interview: Words that Resonate in Recession and Recovery

Check out my interview with Frank Zeccola 
The economic climate hasn’t just affected bank accounts and business prospects. One leading communications strategist says it has actually changed how we’retalking—and this means huge opportunities for PR professionals who can tap into the right kind of messaging to lead their brands and clients out of recession and into recovery.  READ THE ARTICLE

It’s the symbols, stupid.

This was originally published on April 29, 2009 on: cnbc1

Multimillion-dollar compensation packages.  Private jets.  Hormones in milk.   Plastic water bottles.  Chemicals in baby products.   High credit card rates.  Retention bonuses.  

42-19549584

What do these things have in common?  They come from different industries but each represents a common set of challenges that corporations now face.   Each is a symbol
– a shorthand representation
of a much larger ideological perspective.  Each tells a story without having to say a word.  

For better or worse, symbols now dominate the debate: 

Congressmen try to embarrass executives by asking them why they took private jets to their hearing on Capitol Hill rather than trying to grapple with the real issues at hand as a means toward a positive end.    Continue reading

Obama’s Backlash Backlash

It didn’t take long for Obama’s anti-Wall Street rhetoric to start to come back to haunt him.  Already the New York Times is reporting that anger at the financial services industry is threatening to put a wrench in Obama’s agenda.  

I never understood why the President decided to switch from “Yes, We Can” to “Look at what they did.”   It was so off-brand for Obama.  And given Bush’s horrendous approval ratings and the nonstop news coverage of the evil done by Wall Street,  Obama would have been better off focusing on the future and not on the past.   Why further drive people against Wall Street?  Was that really necessary to get the stimulus passed?   Always seemed like gratuitous populism to me.  And it seemed potentially very dangerous to amp up the anti-business hatred.   Continue reading

Santelli v. Gibbs: In communications, offensiveness is not the best defense.

On CNBC yesterday, Rick Santelli wildly rallied a floor of traders against the Obama housing bill.  Santelli’s comments didn’t help the markets, but they certainly did contribute to an increasingly negative reaction to the Obama administration’s efforts to solve the financial crisis.

Today, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs went on the attack.  He went after Santelli for a good four minutes, attacking everything from Santelli’s wealth to his ignorance around the specifics of the housing plan. 

While Santelli’s rant was great theatrics, Gibbs came off downright snippy.    And in that respect, his efforts to shore up confidence in the housing plan were unsuccessful.

Continue reading

It’s not what you say. It’s what they hear.

Why the NY Post is wrong without being wrong.  

We tell all of our clients the same thing:  Intent doesn’t matter in communication; interpretation does.  If your audience is likely to “hear” a certain message from what you say, then that is the message that matters.  End of story. 

And that is where the NY Post got it wrong. 

NY Post Cartoon

Continue reading

Was throwing down the bill really necessary?

If you want to persuade, you need to be credible. 

Watching John Boehner throw down the stimulus bill in front of what was undoubtedly a mostly empty House of Representatives makes me wonder what was the point?   What was the strategy? 

If he was trying to get on TV he succeeded.  So I guess he has that going for him.  

 

If he was trying to rally the people who already agreed with him to agree with him more, he probably succeeded as well.  

But if he was trying to convince even one person who is on the fence, did it work? 

Continue reading

Words That Worked in 2008 (and Some That Didn’t): A Report Card

Originally published on Huffington Post 1/5/09

It’s easy to bemoan the state of the English language today. But the fact is, words still matter. Arguably, more than ever. It’s hard to think of a year filled with so many iconic words as 2008. The following is a list of words used to great — or not so great — effect this past year. Language by its very nature is always evolving, and 2008 imbued these words with different meanings than they had in 2007. Those who saw those new meanings emerged ahead. The following is our admittedly subjective ranking of the top ten words of 2008 and how well people used them.

#1 Change: 
There are few arenas in which as many words fly as in a U.S. presidential election. And this year, “change” was by far the big winner. It was the perfect word for unsettled times. A word that previously suggested uncertainty today conveys a move toward stability. By September, both candidates tried to use it to their advantage. But as in any debate, victory almost always goes to the person first able to define the terms. And the Obama campaign’s incredibly disciplined use of this one word inspired millions of new voters to head to the polls — and carried him to the presidency of the United States. Final assessment: right word, right time. Grade: A

Continue reading